[clamav-users] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.100.0 has been released!

Sergey a_s_y at sama.ru
Tue Jul 17 06:05:50 EDT 2018


On Tuesday 17 July 2018, Al Varnell wrote:

> It's best to use the bytecode interpreter for ClamAV
> bytecode signatures, but if for some reason you feel
> you must use LLVM-JIT  

I thought it was necessary to use llvm to use bytecode
signatures. Was I wrong? Is ClamAV not lost functionality
without LLVM?

-- 
Regards, Sergey


More information about the clamav-users mailing list