[clamav-win32] How to handle wildcards with clamdscan?

[David E. Smith]

Michael Minor wrote:
> The "for" loop may be more efficient on systems with large memory and
> multiple cores, to a point.  Clamdscan will send the file to the running
> instance of clamd anyway, wont it?  Won't clamd handle the threading and
> memory use and keep it manageable?
>   
I'm still trying to figure out whether it's more efficient to have a 
very tiny .Net binary to do it, or a batch file, and to get either one 
of 'em working right. I'll keep folks updated, because I find it hard to 
believe I'm the first person ever to want to do exactly what I'm doing.

David Smith
MVN.net