[clamav-users] Low detection rate

TR Shaw tshaw at oitc.com
Mon Mar 3 09:06:53 EST 2014

btw that one should have been detected by winnow (distributed in Steve's rsync feed)

On Mar 3, 2014, at 9:03 AM, Larry Stone wrote:

> On Mar 3, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Steve Basford <steveb_clamav at sanesecurity.com> wrote:
>>> On 03.03.14 12:38, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>>> Did you just send a link to a known infected file to this list?
>>> Yes, I sent a link to something I felt people answering my question
>>> would need to be able to see, with some text next to it *specifically
>>> saying it was infected*.
>> I think a "h t t p" non-clickable link might have been wise though,
>> just in case someone hasn't had their coffee yet and clicks it...yes,
>> I know... but it does happen ;)
> No matter what you do, some MUA’s take anything that looks like it might be a link and turns it into a link. :-( You need to turn @ into at and . into dot and other obfuscations to be fairly sure some MUA won’t make it clickable.
> -- 
> Larry Stone
> lstone19 at stonejongleux.com
> http://www.stonejongleux.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
> http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.clamav.net/pipermail/clamav-users/attachments/20140303/a8e9ef34/attachment.sig>

More information about the clamav-users mailing list