[clamav-users] clamav-0.98.3 does not pass vulnerability scan

[anctop]

I've tried to change the value of "MaxRecursion" in clamd.conf to 4
and 44 respectively, but both experiments yield the same result.

Can it be a problem with the MTA ?


On 20/05/2014, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar at fantomas.sk> wrote:

> On 20.05.14 16:22, anctop wrote:
>>Both clamav-milter & clamd were still working after the "attack" by the
>> scan.
>>
>>Our config files assume default values for recursive scanning.
>>I'd like to know if the recursion depth is lowered, will clamd fail to
>>detect those viruses deeply hidden in nested directories ?
>
> Well, no idea. The scanning will finish with exit code indicating that it
> was not able to scan the whole structure.
>
> There used to be ArchiveBlockMax option that instructed clamav to report
> infection (with pseudo virus name) but it was removed and I don't see the
> replacement for it.
>
> I also don't see how should clamav-milter behave here.
>
> Maybe I should try to test scanning archive of 16 nested directories to see
> the results...
>
> --
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
> Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
> Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
> I intend to live forever - so far so good.