[clamav-users] Locky Dridex plan

[Stefan Hornburg (Racke)]

On 03/26/2016 02:26 PM, C.D. Cochrane wrote:
> And I am guessing my Linux distro will not just seamlessly move on to 0.99 by itself with an "apt-get update".
>  

If you are using Debian, you will get quite quick upgrades by adding jessie/updates resp. wheezy/updates to
your sources.list.

Regards
          Racke

>  
> 
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 at 11:00 PM
> From: "Joel Esler (jesler)" <jesler at cisco.com>
> To: "ClamAV users ML" <clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>
> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Locky Dridex plan
> Generally this means that we just won't regression test signatures against that version anymore.
> 
> --
> Joel Esler
> Manager, Talos Group
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Mar 25, 2016, at 10:12 PM, Al Varnell <alvarnell at mac.com<mailto:alvarnell at mac.com>> wrote:
> 
> Can you be a little more specific about the manner in which this will take place? Does it just mean no support or do you plan to poison pill the database so the engine will no longer function, as has happened in the past.
> 
> Sent from Janet's iPad
> 
> -Al-
> 
> On Mar 25, 2016, at 6:24 PM, "Joel Esler (jesler)" wrote:
> One step needs to be to EOL 0.97.x releases (as we should have done when we released 0.99, as per our EOL plan). As those older versions don't accept certain types of signatures.
> _______________________________________________
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
> 
> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
> _______________________________________________
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq[https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq]
> 
> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
> _______________________________________________
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
> 
> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
> 


-- 
Perl and Dancer Development