[clamav-users] Latest samba source contains Win.Trojan.Qhost-106?

[Al Varnell]

My impression has long been that the majority of signatures are not e-mail content or attachment related.

Sent from Janet's iPad

-Al-

On Mar 30, 2016, at 2:27 PM, "C.D. Cochrane" <cdc at post.com> wrote:
> It just appears from reading this list that any FP on a non-standard use of the product (not email attachment) gets a high priority among the ClamAV team.  One would think that non-standard FPs would be pushed way down on the to-do list.  If they are getting 1 million virus reports per day, then fixing a false positive on a downloaded distribution should take a few weeks to get to.
> 
>>> Still, people have choices and they can do what they want. Whilst there
>>> is the option, and a belief that an AV solution should be effective,
>>> then naturally people will expect it and report their FP's. (And who
>>> can blame them).
> _______________________________________________
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
> 
> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml