[clamav-users] ClamAV for EnterPrise
alvarnell at mac.com
Thu Apr 20 00:49:30 EDT 2017
Obviously Joel is in a better position to answer these than a fellow user, but I'll give some of it a try.
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 08:05 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Joel Esler (jesler) skrev den 2017-04-20 01:40:
>> Alright all —
>> I think the conversation and arguing has gone on long enough and we’ve
>> beat not only the topic to death, but the topics after the topic are
>> now dead.
>> I’ve received enough complaints at this point to call a truce.
> Joel i can only say you are nearly only one i still not have put autoreader on, its sad to see so many flames of me when user could stop read what i post, thats imho really sad, world would be better if all helped each other, and not trowing bomps on things that is not better after the bomp is trowed
> in gentoo 0.99 is last stable version, and 0.99.1 0.99.2 is masked unstable, what happende to 0.99.3 ?
> freshclam says 0.99.2 is latest version
You'll probably have to ask Gentoo why they are running behind. 0.99.2 has been ClamAV's stable release since it's Apr 22, 2016.
Questions about 0.99.3 would be better asked on clamav-devel, but it's currently an active branch <https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-devel/tree/0.99.3>.
> only thing i wish will come is to see OnUnOFFicial sigs in clamav milter so it can accept and tag 3dr party virus/spam sigs, that will save 1 clamd instance, and one clamav-milter instance
> that way its up to spamassassin to score on results, and if spamas-milter reject if scored to high
> is there plans to have more 3dr party sigs into clamav ?
The policy for the inclusion of 3rd party signatures has long been that the Community is both welcome and encouraged to submit them to the ClamAV Detection Content Team for validation and distribution. I know that some of the main providers have been personally encouraged to do so, but so far have apparently declined. There's even a page where anyone can submit them <http://www.clamav.net/reports/signature>. I seriously doubt that ClamAV will provide open inclusion of such signatures without having an opportunity to check each one for format and then run them against their Quality Control database in an attempt to reduce the number of False Positives.
Mountain View, CA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3569 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the clamav-users