[clamav-users] (No Subject)
Micah Snyder (micasnyd)
micasnyd at cisco.com
Sat Aug 4 19:51:05 UTC 2018
I'm told that the current implementation for VirusEvent in clamd doesn't play well with OnAccess scanning due to the way clamd and OnAccess use threads and the way the current VirusEvent feature relies on forking. VirusEvent was disabled when used with OnAccess until a better implementation can be implemented.
We have a bugzilla ticket here to track the issue: https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12152.
Regards,
Micah
Micah Snyder
ClamAV Development
Talos
Cisco Systems, Inc.
On Aug 3, 2018, at 10:38 PM, greengrasseyes <greengrasseyes at protonmail.com<mailto:greengrasseyes at protonmail.com>> wrote:
I am having a similar issue can anyone confirm or deny this is the
reason for issue:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=237489
_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clamav.net/pipermail/clamav-users/attachments/20180804/edc73e23/attachment.htm>
More information about the clamav-users
mailing list