[clamav-users] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.100.0 has been released!
Micah Snyder (micasnyd)
micasnyd at cisco.com
Tue Jul 17 08:44:05 EDT 2018
ClamAV has 3 options for handling bytecode signatures:
1. Built-in LLVM (based on LLVM 2.8)
2. Built-in bytecode interpreter
3. System-installed LLVM (support limited to LLVM 3.6 at this time, although Debian has had success with a set of patches that enabled support up to 3.9).
With 0.99 the built-in LLVM was preferred over the bytecode interpreter.
With 0.100, the built-in LLVM (2.8) feature was deprecated in favor of either the interpreter or system-installed LLVM (when available). It's still there, but we are hoping to remove it in a future version.
If you don't provide the older LLVM 3.6 for ClamAV, it will use it's built-interpreter rather than just-in-time-compile the signatures.
Cisco Systems, Inc.
On Jul 17, 2018, at 6:05 AM, Sergey <a_s_y at sama.ru<mailto:a_s_y at sama.ru>> wrote:
On Tuesday 17 July 2018, Al Varnell wrote:
It's best to use the bytecode interpreter for ClamAV
bytecode signatures, but if for some reason you feel
you must use LLVM-JIT
I thought it was necessary to use llvm to use bytecode
signatures. Was I wrong? Is ClamAV not lost functionality
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users at lists.clamav.net<mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the clamav-users