[clamav-users] clamav list spf problem

[Tilman Schmidt]

Am 20.06.2018 um 19:14 schrieb Andrew McGlashan:

> This is an opportunity to fix things, such an opportunity should not
> lost, especially if it helps more people to understand the problems with
> having too liberal SPF rules (defeating the purpose of SPF).

I disagree. The purpose of clamav-users is to discuss ClamAV issues, not
to educate people on SPF, so the primary objective of fixing the SPF
record should be reliable delivery, not educational value.

T.