[clamav-users] clamav list spf problem

[Joel Esler (jesler)]

> On Jun 21, 2018, at 3:54 AM, Tilman Schmidt <tschmidt at cardtech.de> wrote:
> 
>> Am 20.06.2018 um 19:14 schrieb Andrew McGlashan:
>> 
>> This is an opportunity to fix things, such an opportunity should not
>> lost, especially if it helps more people to understand the problems with
>> having too liberal SPF rules (defeating the purpose of SPF).
> 
> I disagree. The purpose of clamav-users is to discuss ClamAV issues, not
> to educate people on SPF, so the primary objective of fixing the SPF
> record should be reliable delivery, not educational value.
> 

Generally I don’t mind if things get a little off topic, as long as its done in a civil manner and people aren’t yelling at each other.

But I do agree that it’s probably time to steer this back on course.  I am just returning from being out of the office for almost two weeks.  I’ll dig into this and see what’s up.

Sent from my iPad