[clamav-users] ClamAV performance overhead on RHEL & Solaris

[Yuri]

If I complain about overhead/performance issue, I should:

-Specify hardware/infrastructure details

-Usage of system (some specific)

- Root case (For example "I test 4 Gb-size ISO images and I has CPU
overhead")

WIthout this it is only blah-blah-blah.

For example: In my case, I have 2 socket (4 cores each) Xeon 2.4 GHz CPU
+ 16 Gb RAM hardware, using ClamAV under Solaris 10 for real-time web
traffic scanning. And in my configuration I have no overhead/performance
issues.


17.03.2018 04:59, Yuri пишет:
> So, what?
>
> Real-life experience is useless without full
> infrastructure/configuration comparison.
>
> So, you not focused on real performance issues in this context, just
> bla-bla-bla. What overhead? On what tasks? On what infrastructure/hardware?
>
> What else I miss?
>
>
> 17.03.2018 02:48, Len Sanschargrin пишет:
>> The need is not about issues, or comparisons, it's about real-life experiences with the product and the overhead observed. Of course we'll do our own testing but the earlier we know, the better. We also know some features will cost more in terms of overhead than others, so I'm looking for real experiences around which features are more expensive, etc.. 
>>
>> Thanks very much, Len
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-bounces at lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Yuri
>> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 4:38 PM
>> To: clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV performance overhead on RHEL & Solaris
>>
>> What are you looking for? Performance complains? There is not.
>>
>> https://i.imgur.com/3Likl14.png
>>
>> ClamAV runs on this server and it's ok.
>>
>> Built from sources.
>>
>> 17.03.2018 02:34, Len Sanschargrin пишет:
>>> Any relative numbers you can share?
>>>
>>> Thanks very much, Len Sanschargrin
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-bounces at lists.clamav.net] On 
>>> Behalf Of SCOTT PACKARD
>>> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 3:47 PM
>>> To: ClamAV users ML
>>> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV performance overhead on RHEL & 
>>> Solaris
>>>
>>> It plays on RHEL and Solaris a lot better than Symantec.
>>> You should get your Solaris builds from www.unixpackages.com.
>>>
>>> Regards, Scott
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-bounces at lists.clamav.net] On 
>>>> Behalf Of Len Sanschargrin
>>>> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 10:45 AM
>>>> To: clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>>> Subject: [External] [clamav-users] ClamAV performance overhead on 
>>>> RHEL & Solaris
>>>>
>>>> Hello, I have customer who is preparing to implement ClamAV on RHEL 
>>>> and Solaris. As the Performance engineer, I'm looking for any testing 
>>>> or stats on potential overhead can be associated with running ClamAV.
>>>> Even just anecdotal observations can help us to set expectations and 
>>>> of course any additional guidance is appreciated!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks very much, Len
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> clamav-users mailing list
>>>> clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>>> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
>>>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
>>>>
>>>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> clamav-users mailing list
>>> clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
>>>
>>>
>>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
>>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
>>>
>>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> clamav-users mailing list
>>> clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
>>>
>>>
>>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
>>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
>>>
>>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
>> --
>> "C++ seems like a language suitable for firing other people's legs."
>>
>> *****************************
>> * C++20 : Bug to the future *
>> *****************************
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> clamav-users mailing list
>> clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
>>
>>
>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
>>
>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

-- 
"C++ seems like a language suitable for firing other people's legs."

*****************************
* C++20 : Bug to the future *
*****************************


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.clamav.net/pipermail/clamav-users/attachments/20180317/1ea32e49/attachment.sig>