[clamav-users] [External] Re: Scan very slow
Kevin A. McGrail
KMcGrail at PCCC.com
Thu Apr 18 10:00:42 UTC 2019
Thanks Al and thanks to the ClamAV team for the quick work on this.
Love ClamAV.
Here's some some data on one system about the times for freshclam to
complete:
25409 Freshclam took 3:30s
25410 Freshclam took 9:27s
25422 Freshclam took 9:17s
25423 Freshclam took 1:53s
Here's some of the snippets for a few data points above:
Thu Apr 4 04:01:09 2019 -> *Current working dir is
/usr/local/clamav/share/clamav
Thu Apr 4 04:01:09 2019 -> *Max retries == 3
Thu Apr 4 04:01:09 2019 -> ClamAV update process started at Thu Apr 4
04:01:09 2019
Thu Apr 4 04:01:09 2019 -> *Using IPv6 aware code
Thu Apr 4 04:01:09 2019 -> *Querying current.cvd.clamav.net
Thu Apr 4 04:01:09 2019 -> *TTL: 1800
Thu Apr 4 04:01:09 2019 -> *Software version from DNS: 0.101.2
Thu Apr 4 04:01:09 2019 -> ^Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
Thu Apr 4 04:01:09 2019 -> ^Local version: 0.100.2 Recommended version:
0.101.2
Thu Apr 4 04:01:09 2019 -> DON'T PANIC! Read
https://www.clamav.net/documents/upgrading-clamav
Thu Apr 4 04:01:09 2019 -> *main.cvd version from DNS: 58
Thu Apr 4 04:01:09 2019 -> main.cld is up to date (version: 58, sigs:
4566249, f-level: 60, builder: sigmgr)
Thu Apr 4 04:01:09 2019 -> *daily.cvd version from DNS: 25409
Thu Apr 4 04:01:16 2019 -> *Retrieving
http://db.US.clamav.net/daily-25409.cdiff
Thu Apr 4 04:01:16 2019 -> *Trying to download
http://db.US.clamav.net/daily-25409.cdiff (IP: 104.16.219.84)
Thu Apr 4 04:01:16 2019 -> Downloading daily-25409.cdiff [100%]
Thu Apr 4 04:01:17 2019 -> *cdiff_apply: Parsed 2477 lines and executed
2477 commands
Thu Apr 4 04:01:18 2019 -> *Loading signatures from daily.cld
Thu Apr 4 04:03:21 2019 -> *Properly loaded 1543509 signatures from new
daily.cld
Thu Apr 4 04:03:22 2019 -> daily.cld updated (version: 25409, sigs:
1543509, f-level: 63, builder: raynman)
Thu Apr 4 04:03:22 2019 -> *Querying
daily.25409.93.1.0.6810DB54.ping.clamav.net
Thu Apr 4 04:03:22 2019 -> *bytecode.cvd version from DNS: 328
Thu Apr 4 04:03:22 2019 -> bytecode.cld is up to date (version: 328,
sigs: 94, f-level: 63, builder: neo)
Thu Apr 4 04:03:39 2019 -> Database updated (6109852 signatures) from
db.US.clamav.net (IP: 104.16.219.84)
Thu Apr 4 04:03:39 2019 -> Clamd successfully notified about the update.
Fri Apr 5 05:01:10 2019 -> *Current working dir is
/usr/local/clamav/share/clamav
Fri Apr 5 05:01:10 2019 -> *Max retries == 3
Fri Apr 5 05:01:10 2019 -> ClamAV update process started at Fri Apr 5
05:01:10 2019
Fri Apr 5 05:01:10 2019 -> *Using IPv6 aware code
Fri Apr 5 05:01:10 2019 -> *Querying current.cvd.clamav.net
Fri Apr 5 05:01:10 2019 -> *TTL: 1800
Fri Apr 5 05:01:10 2019 -> *Software version from DNS: 0.101.2
Fri Apr 5 05:01:10 2019 -> ^Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
Fri Apr 5 05:01:10 2019 -> ^Local version: 0.100.2 Recommended version:
0.101.2
Fri Apr 5 05:01:10 2019 -> DON'T PANIC! Read
https://www.clamav.net/documents/upgrading-clamav
Fri Apr 5 05:01:10 2019 -> *main.cvd version from DNS: 58
Fri Apr 5 05:01:10 2019 -> main.cld is up to date (version: 58, sigs:
4566249, f-level: 60, builder: sigmgr)
Fri Apr 5 05:01:10 2019 -> *daily.cvd version from DNS: 25410
Fri Apr 5 05:01:15 2019 -> *Retrieving
http://db.US.clamav.net/daily-25410.cdiff
Fri Apr 5 05:01:15 2019 -> *Trying to download
http://db.US.clamav.net/daily-25410.cdiff (IP: 104.16.219.84)
Fri Apr 5 05:01:16 2019 -> Downloading daily-25410.cdiff [100%]
Fri Apr 5 05:01:22 2019 -> *cdiff_apply: Parsed 9065 lines and executed
9065 commands
Fri Apr 5 05:01:24 2019 -> *Loading signatures from daily.cld
Fri Apr 5 05:10:19 2019 -> *Properly loaded 1552552 signatures from new
daily.cld
Fri Apr 5 05:10:20 2019 -> daily.cld updated (version: 25410, sigs:
1552552, f-level: 63, builder: raynman)
Fri Apr 5 05:10:20 2019 -> *Querying
daily.25410.93.1.0.6810DB54.ping.clamav.net
Fri Apr 5 05:10:22 2019 -> *bytecode.cvd version from DNS: 328
Fri Apr 5 05:10:22 2019 -> bytecode.cld is up to date (version: 328,
sigs: 94, f-level: 63, builder: neo)
Fri Apr 5 05:10:37 2019 -> Database updated (6118895 signatures) from
db.US.clamav.net (IP: 104.16.219.84)
Fri Apr 5 05:10:37 2019 -> Clamd successfully notified about the update.
Thu Apr 18 05:01:37 2019 -> *Current working dir is
/usr/local/clamav/share/clamav
Thu Apr 18 05:01:37 2019 -> *Max retries == 3
Thu Apr 18 05:01:37 2019 -> ClamAV update process started at Thu Apr 18
05:01:37 2019
Thu Apr 18 05:01:37 2019 -> *Using IPv6 aware code
Thu Apr 18 05:01:37 2019 -> *Querying current.cvd.clamav.net
Thu Apr 18 05:01:37 2019 -> *TTL: 1800
Thu Apr 18 05:01:37 2019 -> *Software version from DNS: 0.101.2
Thu Apr 18 05:01:37 2019 -> ^Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
Thu Apr 18 05:01:37 2019 -> ^Local version: 0.100.3 Recommended version:
0.101.2
Thu Apr 18 05:01:37 2019 -> DON'T PANIC! Read
https://www.clamav.net/documents/upgrading-clamav
Thu Apr 18 05:01:37 2019 -> *main.cvd version from DNS: 58
Thu Apr 18 05:01:37 2019 -> main.cvd is up to date (version: 58, sigs:
4566249, f-level: 60, builder: sigmgr)
Thu Apr 18 05:01:37 2019 -> *daily.cvd version from DNS: 25423
Thu Apr 18 05:01:47 2019 -> *Retrieving
http://db.US.clamav.net/daily-25423.cdiff
Thu Apr 18 05:01:47 2019 -> *Trying to download
http://db.US.clamav.net/daily-25423.cdiff (IP: 104.16.219.84)
Thu Apr 18 05:01:48 2019 -> Downloading daily-25423.cdiff [100%]
Thu Apr 18 05:01:48 2019 -> *cdiff_apply: Parsed 4849 lines and executed
4849 commands
Thu Apr 18 05:01:51 2019 -> *Loading signatures from daily.cld
Thu Apr 18 05:03:13 2019 -> *Properly loaded 1551908 signatures from new
daily.cld
Thu Apr 18 05:03:14 2019 -> daily.cld updated (version: 25423, sigs:
1551908, f-level: 63, builder: raynman)
Thu Apr 18 05:03:14 2019 -> *Querying
daily.25423.93.1.0.6810DB54.ping.clamav.net
Thu Apr 18 05:03:14 2019 -> *bytecode.cvd version from DNS: 328
Thu Apr 18 05:03:14 2019 -> bytecode.cvd is up to date (version: 328,
sigs: 94, f-level: 63, builder: neo)
Thu Apr 18 05:03:30 2019 -> Database updated (6118251 signatures) from
db.US.clamav.net (IP: 104.16.219.84)
Thu Apr 18 05:03:30 2019 -> Clamd successfully notified about the update.
Regards,
KAM
On 4/18/2019 4:45 AM, Al Varnell via clamav-users wrote:
> Looks like all Phish.Phishing.REPHISH_ID_... signatures were dropped
> by daily-25423 today.
>
> -Al-
>
>> On Apr 17, 2019, at 04:02, Al Varnell <alvarnell at mac.com
>> <mailto:alvarnell at mac.com>> wrote:
>>
>> There are still 2515 "Phish.Phishing.REPHISH_ID_...." signatures in
>> daily.ldb
>>
>> -Al-
>>
>>> On Apr 17, 2019, at 03:36, Maarten Broekman
>>> <maarten.broekman at gmail.com <mailto:maarten.broekman at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Are the "Phish" REPHISH signatures still in the daily or were they
>>> removed as well? Those were causing part of the issue.
>>>
>>>
>>> --Maarten
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 5:24 AM Al Varnell via clamav-users
>>> <clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>> <mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>> An additional
>>> 3968 Phishtank.Phishing.PHISH_ID_??????? signatures were dropped
>>> by daily-25417 on 12 April, and I can't seem to locate any more.
>>>
>>> -Al-
>>>
>>>> On Apr 17, 2019, at 02:01, Mark Allan via clamav-users
>>>> <clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>>> <mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Micah,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry to pester you, but have you any update on when the
>>>> remaining Phishtank signatures will be getting removed? It
>>>> would be really great to get scan times properly back to normal.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 16:32, Micah Snyder (micasnyd)
>>>> <micasnyd at cisco.com <mailto:micasnyd at cisco.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Mark,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, the plan is still to remove the rest of the Phishtank
>>>> signatures. We wanted to get things back to relative
>>>> normal and resolve the immediate crisis. We’ll remove the
>>>> rest of them soon.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Micah
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From: *Mark Allan <markjallan at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:markjallan at gmail.com>>
>>>> *Date: *Tuesday, April 9, 2019 at 6:26 AM
>>>> *To: *"Micah Snyder (micasnyd)" <micasnyd at cisco.com
>>>> <mailto:micasnyd at cisco.com>>
>>>> *Cc: *ClamAV users ML <clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>>> <mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>>
>>>> *Subject: *Re: [External] Re: [clamav-users] Scan very slow
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The scan times are definitely better than they were - in
>>>> fact, they're back to how they were before last week's
>>>> inclusion of the Phishtank signatures. They're still almost
>>>> double what they used to be though, and as far as I can
>>>> see, there are still almost 4000 Phishtank signatures in
>>>> the DB:
>>>>
>>>> $ sigtool --find Phishtank | wc -l
>>>>
>>>> 3968
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can I request that those ones also be removed please?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 at 14:43, Micah Snyder (micasnyd)
>>>> <micasnyd at cisco.com <mailto:micasnyd at cisco.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Tim,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There are a couple of ways for users to drop specific
>>>> categories of signatures at this time. Sadly, they
>>>> wouldn’t have helped this last week. These include
>>>> bytecode signatures, PUA (potentially unwanted
>>>> applications) signatures, Email.Phishing and
>>>> HTML.Phishing signatures, and the Safebrowsing database.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If we had named the Phishtank.Phishing sigs to
>>>> HTML.Phishing.Phishtank or Email.Phishing.Phishtank
>>>> then they could have been disabled with the clamscan
>>>> option `--phishing-sigs=no` (clamd.conf:
>>>> `PhishingSignatures no`).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Maybe a better option would be for us to create a new
>>>> optional database for phishing signatures. However, the
>>>> names for the databases are hardcoded into freshclam,
>>>> so it is non-trivial to add a new database and would
>>>> require a few changes to ClamAV’s code. We have talked
>>>> about making the databases easier to add/remove in the
>>>> future so users can have more categories to
>>>> enable/disable. In this light, it ties in well with
>>>> existing plans.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Of note the Phishtank sigs from Friday’s daily were
>>>> removed yesterday and scan times should be back to normal.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Micah
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From: *Tim Hawkins <tim.hawkins at redflaggroup.com
>>>> <mailto:tim.hawkins at redflaggroup.com>>
>>>> *Date: *Friday, April 5, 2019 at 6:06 PM
>>>> *To: *ClamAV users ML <clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>>> <mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>>, Mark Allan
>>>> <markjallan at gmail.com <mailto:markjallan at gmail.com>>
>>>> *Cc: *"Micah Snyder (micasnyd)" <micasnyd at cisco.com
>>>> <mailto:micasnyd at cisco.com>>
>>>> *Subject: *Re: [External] Re: [clamav-users] Scan very slow
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Micah
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Does clamav partition the database so that signatures
>>>> that are mainly associated with email scanning can be
>>>> dropped out for folks only needing filesystems scans,
>>>> none of our systems use email, and we dont make use of
>>>> the mailer extension.
>>>>
>>>> Having to load all the email focused signatures could
>>>> as you have observed impact performance.
>>>>
>>>> Sent from Nine <http://www.9folders.com/>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> *From:* "Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users"
>>>> <clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>>> <mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>>
>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, April 6, 2019 03:18
>>>> *To:* ClamAV users ML; Mark Allan
>>>> *Cc:* Micah Snyder (micasnyd)
>>>> *Subject:* [External] Re: [clamav-users] Scan very slow
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regarding slow scan times today (and slow scan times in
>>>> general), it appears that the signatures we generate
>>>> based on PhishTank’s feed for phishing URLs are
>>>> resulting in very slow load and scan times.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Today’s daily update saw 7448 new Phishtank signatures
>>>> (much higher than usual) coinciding with the immediate
>>>> performance drop for load time and scan time. One user
>>>> reported that the load time today on some of his slower
>>>> machines was slow enough to exceed the timeout for
>>>> service startup
>>>> (https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12317).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In limited testing on my own machine I saw the
>>>> following change after dropping the Phishtank.Phishing
>>>> signatures from daily.cvd’s daily.ldb file:
>>>>
>>>> * Database load time on my laptop went from
>>>> 75.43203997612 seconds down to 14.859203100204468
>>>> seconds
>>>> * Scan time (for an arbitrary pdf) went from 1.798
>>>> sec to 0.644 sec.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> After some discussion between the teams that work on
>>>> ClamAV and ClamAV signature content and deployment,
>>>> we’ve agreed to drop PhishTank signatures from the
>>>> database until we can determine a way to craft
>>>> Phishtank signatures without incurring such a
>>>> significant performance hit.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The daily update tomorrow will have the change.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Micah
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Micah Snyder
>>>> ClamAV Development
>>>> Talos
>>>> Cisco Systems, Inc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From: *clamav-users
>>>> <clamav-users-bounces at lists.clamav.net
>>>> <mailto:clamav-users-bounces at lists.clamav.net>> on
>>>> behalf of "Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users"
>>>> <clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>>> <mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>>
>>>> *Reply-To: *ClamAV users ML
>>>> <clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>>> <mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>>
>>>> *Date: *Friday, April 5, 2019 at 1:08 PM
>>>> *To: *Mark Allan <markjallan at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:markjallan at gmail.com>>, ClamAV users ML
>>>> <clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>>> <mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>>
>>>> *Cc: *"Micah Snyder (micasnyd)" <micasnyd at cisco.com
>>>> <mailto:micasnyd at cisco.com>>
>>>> *Subject: *Re: [clamav-users] Scan very slow
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Mark,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sorry about the delay in responding. I hadn’t looked
>>>> at my clamav-users filter this morning. Just
>>>> investigating now. Will respond when I know more.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Micah
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From: *Mark Allan <markjallan at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:markjallan at gmail.com>>
>>>> *Date: *Friday, April 5, 2019 at 9:12 AM
>>>> *To: *ClamAV users ML <clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>>> <mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>>, "Micah Snyder
>>>> (micasnyd)" <micasnyd at cisco.com
>>>> <mailto:micasnyd at cisco.com>>
>>>> *Subject: *Re: [clamav-users] Scan very slow
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Also CC'ing Micah directly as the mailing list would
>>>> appear to be offline (at least lists.clamav.net
>>>> <http://lists.clamav.net/> isn't responding to http
>>>> requests anyway)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It looks like scan times have gone through the roof. As
>>>> Oya said, they're still considerably higher than they
>>>> were a couple of months ago, but today's scan time is
>>>> insane.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yesterday's scan using
>>>>
>>>> 0.101.2:58:25409:1554370140:1:63:48554:328
>>>>
>>>> took 7m 3s
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On the same hardware, scanning the same read-only disk
>>>> image, with today's scan using
>>>>
>>>> 0.101.2:58:25410:1554452941:1:63:48557:328
>>>>
>>>> the scan time has jumped to 26m 15s
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is the longest it has ever taken to scan this
>>>> volume (cf my previous email of 25th March)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is there anything that can be excluded?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 17:11, Micah Snyder (micasnyd)
>>>> via clamav-users <clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>>> <mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Oya for the update. We will continue to
>>>> investigate the signature performance issue.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Micah
>>>>
>>>> On 3/28/19, 9:50 AM, "clamav-users on behalf of
>>>> Tsutomu Oyamada"
>>>> <clamav-users-bounces at lists.clamav.net
>>>> <mailto:clamav-users-bounces at lists.clamav.net> on
>>>> behalf of oyamada at promark-inc.com
>>>> <mailto:oyamada at promark-inc.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Micah
>>>>
>>>> It seems that the scanning slow down issue of
>>>> this time has been solved
>>>> at some level with CVD Update of the other day.
>>>> However, there is still big discrepancy in
>>>> between the current condition and
>>>> the last condition in one month ago.
>>>>
>>>> Date Files Scan time
>>>> 2019/02/15 2550338 08:53:57
>>>> 2019/03/15 2612792 19:22:54
>>>> 2019/03/26 2634489 18:13:56
>>>> 2019/03/27 2637201 18:10:05
>>>>
>>>> We know the improvement of this time is due to
>>>> the details of CVD, because
>>>> we did not make any change on the user's system.
>>>> We are going to try some tuning for scanning.
>>>>
>>>> We like to know if you still have some room to
>>>> make further improvement
>>>> for this slow down issue.
>>>> Thank you for your help, in advance.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Oya
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:45:02 +0000
>>>> "Micah Snyder \(micasnyd\) via clamav-users"
>>>> <clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>>> <mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hi Mark, all:
>>>> >
>>>> > I’m disappointed to hear that it is still
>>>> slow for you.
>>>> >
>>>> > We found that the target-type of signatures
>>>> used for PhishTank.Phishing signatures were causing
>>>> a significant slowdown. We have dropped them as
>>>> of this past Saturday
>>>> (https://lists.gt.net/clamav/virusdb/75279 ) and in
>>>> the last two updates have been re-adding them with
>>>> more specific scan target types. We’re now
>>>> investigating some other optimizations we can make
>>>> for the next major ClamAV release to improve scan
>>>> times but at present we don’t have any other leads
>>>> for signatures that may be slowing down scans.
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards,
>>>> > Micah
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > From: clamav-users
>>>> <clamav-users-bounces at lists.clamav.net
>>>> <mailto:clamav-users-bounces at lists.clamav.net>> on
>>>> behalf of Mark Allan via clamav-users
>>>> <clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>>> <mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>>
>>>> > Reply-To: ClamAV users ML
>>>> <clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>>> <mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>>
>>>> > Date: Monday, March 25, 2019 at 9:37 AM
>>>> > To: ClamAV users ML
>>>> <clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>>> <mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>>
>>>> > Cc: Mark Allan <markjallan at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:markjallan at gmail.com>>
>>>> > Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Scan very slow
>>>> >
>>>> > Cheers Steve,
>>>> >
>>>> > In the interest of completeness, here's the
>>>> scan from today (TXT from DNS:
>>>> 0.101.1:58:25399:1553509741:1:63:48528:328) showing
>>>> a marked improvement in scan time, although at 6m
>>>> 7s it's still almost twice what it used to be.
>>>> >
>>>> > Mark
>>>> >
>>>> > On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 12:56, Steve Basford
>>>> <steveb_clamav at sanesecurity.com
>>>> <mailto:steveb_clamav at sanesecurity.com><mailto:steveb_clamav at sanesecurity.com
>>>> <mailto:steveb_clamav at sanesecurity.com>>> wrote:
>>>> > On 2019-03-25 10:52, Mark Allan via
>>>> clamav-users wrote:
>>>> > > Hi all,
>>>> > >
>>>> > te.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Hopefully this helps someone to narrow
>>>> things down a bit.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Mark
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> > 18/3/19 10m 49s TXT from DNS:
>>>> > 0.101.1:58:25392:1552904941:1:63:48507:328
>>>> ***
>>>> >
>>>> > Here's the changes for the above update:
>>>> >
>>>> > https://lists.gt.net/clamav/virusdb/75154
>>>> >
>>>> > You can also check sigs quickly per update:
>>>> >
>>>> > https://lists.gt.net/clamav/virusdb/
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Cheers,
>>>> >
>>>> > Steve
>>>> > Twitter: @sanesecurity
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> >
>>>> > clamav-users mailing list
>>>> > clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>>> <mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net><mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>>> <mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>>
>>>>
>>>> > https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
>>>> > https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
>>>> >
>>>> > http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>> clamav-users mailing list
>>>> clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>>> <mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>
>>>>
>>>> https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
>>>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
>>>>
>>>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>> clamav-users mailing list
>>>> clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>>> <mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>
>>>> https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
>>>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
>>>>
>>>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *DISCLAIMER*
>>>>
>>>> The information contained in this email and any
>>>> attachments are confidential. It is intended solely for
>>>> the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
>>>> Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized.
>>>>
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
>>>> copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to
>>>> be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
>>>> unlawful. If you have received this communication in
>>>> error, please notify us immediately by responding to
>>>> this email and then delete it from your system.
>>>>
>>>> The Red Flag Group is neither liable for the proper and
>>>> complete transmission of the information contained in
>>>> this communication nor for any delay in its receipt.
>>>>
>>>> Any advice, recommendations or opinion contained within
>>>> this email or its attachments are not to be construed
>>>> as legal advice.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>> clamav-users mailing list
>>>> clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>>>> <mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>
>>>> https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
>>>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
>>>>
>>>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>> clamav-users mailing list
>>> clamav-users at lists.clamav.net <mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>
>>> https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
>>>
>>>
>>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
>>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
>>>
>>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> clamav-users mailing list
> clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
> https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
>
>
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
>
> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
--
*Kevin A. McGrail*
CEO Emeritus
Peregrine Computer Consultants Corporation
10311 Cascade Lane
Fairfax, VA 22032
http://www.pccc.com/
703-359-9700 / 800-823-8402 (Toll-Free)
703-798-0171 (wireless)
KMcGrail at PCCC.com <mailto:kmcgrail at pccc.com>
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clamav.net/pipermail/clamav-users/attachments/20190418/7140d2c3/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pccc_logo.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 5282 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.clamav.net/pipermail/clamav-users/attachments/20190418/7140d2c3/attachment.gif>
More information about the clamav-users
mailing list