[clamav-users] Scan very slow
oyamada at promark-inc.com
Thu Mar 28 09:49:39 EDT 2019
It seems that the scanning slow down issue of this time has been solved
at some level with CVD Update of the other day.
However, there is still big discrepancy in between the current condition and
the last condition in one month ago.
Date Files Scan time
2019/02/15 2550338 08:53:57
2019/03/15 2612792 19:22:54
2019/03/26 2634489 18:13:56
2019/03/27 2637201 18:10:05
We know the improvement of this time is due to the details of CVD, because
we did not make any change on the user's system.
We are going to try some tuning for scanning.
We like to know if you still have some room to make further improvement
for this slow down issue.
Thank you for your help, in advance.
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:45:02 +0000
"Micah Snyder \(micasnyd\) via clamav-users" <clamav-users at lists.clamav.net> wrote:
> Hi Mark, all:
> I’m disappointed to hear that it is still slow for you.
> We found that the target-type of signatures used for PhishTank.Phishing signatures were causing a significant slowdown. We have dropped them as of this past Saturday ( https://lists.gt.net/clamav/virusdb/75279 ) and in the last two updates have been re-adding them with more specific scan target types. We’re now investigating some other optimizations we can make for the next major ClamAV release to improve scan times but at present we don’t have any other leads for signatures that may be slowing down scans.
> From: clamav-users <clamav-users-bounces at lists.clamav.net> on behalf of Mark Allan via clamav-users <clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>
> Reply-To: ClamAV users ML <clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>
> Date: Monday, March 25, 2019 at 9:37 AM
> To: ClamAV users ML <clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>
> Cc: Mark Allan <markjallan at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Scan very slow
> Cheers Steve,
> In the interest of completeness, here's the scan from today (TXT from DNS: 0.101.1:58:25399:1553509741:1:63:48528:328) showing a marked improvement in scan time, although at 6m 7s it's still almost twice what it used to be.
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 12:56, Steve Basford <steveb_clamav at sanesecurity.com<mailto:steveb_clamav at sanesecurity.com>> wrote:
> On 2019-03-25 10:52, Mark Allan via clamav-users wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > Hopefully this helps someone to narrow things down a bit.
> > Mark
> 18/3/19 10m 49s TXT from DNS:
> 0.101.1:58:25392:1552904941:1:63:48507:328 ***
> Here's the changes for the above update:
> You can also check sigs quickly per update:
> Twitter: @sanesecurity
> clamav-users mailing list
> clamav-users at lists.clamav.net<mailto:clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
More information about the clamav-users