[clamav-users] Squid + ClamAV

Andrea Venturoli ml at netfence.it
Tue Apr 7 08:51:58 UTC 2020


On 2020-04-01 17:36, G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote:

>  My approach would probably be to start with very little in
> the signature database(s) and gradually add things which might prove
> useful, at the same time excluding anything which might be expected to
> be nearly useless in this application, all the time logging verbosely.

I thought about this, but this is gonna be a *long* work.



> You might need to put extra intelligence into splitting content from
> headers etc. before you pass the data to the scanner. 

I guess the above layers (squid+c-icap+squidclamav) already do this.



>  I imagine you'll want to
> set up instrumentation to attempt to measure the performance of the
> individual signatures - or at least of the separate databases

You imagine right :)
Any idea how this can be achieved?



  bye & Thanks
	av.



More information about the clamav-users mailing list