[clamav-users] Squid + ClamAV
Andrea Venturoli
ml at netfence.it
Tue Apr 7 08:51:58 UTC 2020
On 2020-04-01 17:36, G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote:
> My approach would probably be to start with very little in
> the signature database(s) and gradually add things which might prove
> useful, at the same time excluding anything which might be expected to
> be nearly useless in this application, all the time logging verbosely.
I thought about this, but this is gonna be a *long* work.
> You might need to put extra intelligence into splitting content from
> headers etc. before you pass the data to the scanner.
I guess the above layers (squid+c-icap+squidclamav) already do this.
> I imagine you'll want to
> set up instrumentation to attempt to measure the performance of the
> individual signatures - or at least of the separate databases
You imagine right :)
Any idea how this can be achieved?
bye & Thanks
av.
More information about the clamav-users
mailing list