[clamav-users] Scanning emails

[Matus UHLAR - fantomas]

>On 3/29/20 10:10 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> I disagree, setting up clamav-milter is much easier than settingup amavis.

On 29.03.20 10:26, PGNet Dev via clamav-users wrote:
>you're not alone

>> I use clamav-milter

>same here

>> and spamass-milter on my machine. So, I have both spam
>> and virus scanning. Didn't have big need to replace them by amavis here.

>i'm looking to remove amavis from my mix
>
>at the moment i use it only for 2 passes of SA ... one pre-queue, one post-queue.
>
>curious as to the basis for your spamass-milter choice, vs other SA-only invervetions such as spampd, etc. ?

milter runs as pre-queue, so I can reject spam without caring about bounces
or dropping mail.

This can be a downside if your customers expect quick response from mail
server and complain.

The latter is case for post-queue solutions.

>i've just started looking at the lot of 'em.  some seem pretty
> dusty/unmaintained -- i just dunno yet whether that matters at all, or if
> they're just simple/stable enough.
>
>would be useful to hear your experience ...

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool.