[clamav-users] clamscan vs clamdscan

iulian stan iulian at sphere.ro
Sat May 9 18:15:35 UTC 2020


Dear Christian, 

It's normal that scanning with clamdscan takes a shorter time than
clamscan because the virus databases is already loaded (since it's a
daemon) and ready for action. For testing purposes(debugging, etc) you
can use clamscan for all other purposes use clamdscan where you don't
need to wait to load the virus database on each run.

---
Best regards,
Iulian 

On 2020-05-09 18:43, Christian wrote:

> Hi altogether,
> 
> I´ve got a question regarding clamscan vs clamdscan.
> 
> My system is Linux/BodhiLinux 5.1.0 in a VM.
> As antivirus-software I installed clamav:
> 
> _sudo apt-get install clamav clamav-freshclam_
> 
> Scanning procedure is good although a bit slow. So in addition to that I installed the service clamd:
> 
> _sudo apt-get install clamav-daemon_
> 
> Scanning is much faster now.
> 
> My question is: Is it alright to have  clamav and clamav-daemon installed alongside each other?
> So that I can run  either "clamscan somefile"  or  "clamdscan somefile"?
> 
> Thanks a lot in advance.
> 
> Greetings.
> Rosika 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> clamav-users mailing list
> clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
> https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
> 
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
> 
> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clamav.net/pipermail/clamav-users/attachments/20200509/93fae5eb/attachment.htm>


More information about the clamav-users mailing list