[clamav-users] clamscan vs clamdscan

[Matus UHLAR - fantomas]

>>On Sat, 9 May 2020, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users wrote:
>>>On our mailserver, we run clamdscan, since mail arrives frequently (!).

>Citeren "G.W. Haywood via clamav-users" <clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>:
>>On a mail server most people would use a milter, e.g. clamav-milter,
>>which is part of the ClamAV package.

On 10.05.20 10:51, Arjen de Korte via clamav-users wrote:
>It depends. There are other ways to filter before accepting messages. 
>I use the proxy filter in Postfix to scan messages with Amavisd (which 
>will scan for both viruses and spam). No milter involved.

I prever to use amavisd-milter, e.g.  because it can be combined with other
milters, while smtpd proxy has problems combining.

And, also, milter only adds one Received: header and makes looking through
logs easier.

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I drive way too fast to worry about cholesterol.