[clamav-users] Perplexing response to malware submission.

G.W. Haywood clamav at jubileegroup.co.uk
Thu Aug 5 07:12:03 UTC 2021


Hi there,

We have just received this response to one of our automated submissions:

8<----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Thu, 5 Aug 2021, noreply at clamav.com wrote:

> G.W. Haywood,
> 
> Thank you again for your submission.
> 
> Your File: da741cdec6a0db5f40b79cbfbe300761450d216159ea83533d754d7de43cf6a3
> (SHA256: fc1e483dbb60d49205e3d238b3d090e6cc7a49b775bf4e519aba7117ab3a5b43)
> 
> Our initial assessment shows that this file is possibly clean. If
> you provided a description that suggests otherwise, we will further
> examine the sample & proceed from there.
> 
> -The ClamAV team
8<----------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's the result of our check against fifteen scanners, available via
Jotti's extremely useful service, and which is run before each of the
submissions made by our system:

8<----------------------------------------------------------------------
clamav.net		Found nothing
f-prot.com		Found nothing
k7computing.com		Found nothing
trendmicro.com		Found nothing
fortinet.com		MSIL/Kryptik.DZG!tr
eset.com		MSIL/Spy.Agent.AES
sophos.com		Mal/RarMal-C
anti-virus.by		Malware-Cryptor.MSIL.AgentTesla.Heur
bitdefender.com		Trojan.GenericKD.46737949
escanav.com		Trojan.GenericKD.46737949
gdatasoftware.com	Trojan.GenericKD.46737949
ikarus.at		Trojan.Inject
drweb.com		Trojan.PackedNET.964
f-secure.com		Trojan:W32/MaliciousAttachment.F
avast.com		Win32:PWSX-gen
8<----------------------------------------------------------------------

This is one of the clearer threat reports, and I'm surprised by the
initial assessment from the ClamAV team.  The report was sent using
the 'clamsubmit' utility, which does not offer an option to provide
a description of the malware.

What should I do now?

-- 

73,
Ged.


More information about the clamav-users mailing list