[clamav-users] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.104.0 Release Candidate is here!

[Frans de Boer]

n 7/26/21 8:39 PM, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users wrote:
> Frans,
>
> Can you please create a ticket on https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav/issues for the clamd test failure? Please attach the verbose output from running:
>    ctest -V
>
> Regarding make -j [n] vs ninja -- yes it's not a huge difference.  It's just a convenience if you're compiling a lot.  We should probably remove the ninja suggestion from the INSTALL.md file.
> I didn't include it in https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Installing/Installing-from-source-Unix.html
> We do mention it here, which is good enough: https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Development/development-builds.html
>
> -Micah
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: clamav-users <clamav-users-bounces at lists.clamav.net> On Behalf Of
>> Frans de Boer
>> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2021 11:08 AM
>> To: clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
>> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.104.0 Release Candidate
>> is here!
>>
>> I get things compiled etc., but testing clamd keeps on failing. I tried three
>> different machines/CPU's to no avail.
>>
>> I use OpenSUSE Tumbleweed with newest cmake etc.
>>
>> One remark: using 'make -j [n]' instead of ninja only takes less than 2 seconds
>> longer to build things. So, the 'big speed up' is only a 'very minor speed up'. Of
>> course if you compile a very large amount of software every day, multiple times
>> a day, those less than 2 seconds do add up.
>>
>> Any suggestion what data I can provide to find the cause of the failure?
>>
>> Regards, Frans.
G.W. Haywood told me he would make a ticket. He also - just as the whole 
list - has the full Testlog.log file since 25/7.

--- Frans.