[clamav-users] Restriction of downloads

[Matus UHLAR - fantomas]

On 13.03.21 12:47, Joel Esler (jesler) via clamav-users wrote:
>The qnap and synology issues are a result of the EOL of <0.100. Not as a result of the abusive downloaders. Two separate issues.

are freshclam versions <0.100 blocked?  Because they seem to support cdiffs.
I understand the rest.

Just wanted to note that QNAP does use freshclam - I misunderstood Paul
Smith's comment about their mirror.
They do not provide mirror, because their devices with obsolete ClamAV
aren't supported.

>It is becoming more and more necessary to enforce these cut off points
> because of many reasons.  Load to the mirror network being one.  So, .100,
> and .101 will continue to be supported for a bit, but soon, we’re going to
> have to cut those off too.

Do those versions cause some additional problems for your mirrors?


-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I feel like I'm diagonally parked in a parallel universe.