[clamav-users] CLAMAV: Docker Tag 0.104.2 has 9 Medium Vulnerabilities for Busy Box

[Jaspal Singh Sandhu]

Hi Micah,

I will use https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav/issues/new/choose.

There was no intention of Mocking.   It was simply to let you know that we
saw the vulnerabilities in busybox and pulled back from that image.

We have successfully upgraded clamav.  It is an awesome product.

Nowadays, it is good to be extra cautious.

Again, thanks for your support.

Thanks,

Jaspal  Sandhu
Roberthalf

On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 11:52 AM Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users <
clamav-users at lists.clamav.net> wrote:

> Please don't hijack a thread to report a bug or request an improvement. A
> new thread for new discussion topic is always great.
>
> Please also be careful in your phrasing. ClamAV's docker support was 99%
> the work of a kind-hearted community member. Mocking the current design
> isn't helpful. I do see what you're talking about. I'm sure there is room
> for improvement.
>
> If you know there is a bug, please report the issue
> https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav/issues/new/choose
> <https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav/issues/new?assignees=&labels=&template=bug_report.md&title=>
> If you have a proposed solution for the issue, it's still good to make the
> issue and submit your solution in a pull-request.
>
> Regards,
> Micah
>
> Micah Snyder
> ClamAV Development
> Talos
> Cisco Systems, Inc.
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Marc <Marc at f1-outsourcing.eu>
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 13, 2022 5:02 AM
> *To:* ClamAV users ML <clamav-users at lists.clamav.net>
> *Cc:* Micah Snyder (micasnyd) <micasnyd at cisco.com>; Sandhu, Jaspal (HQP) <
> jaspal.sandhu at roberthalf.com>
> *Subject:* RE: CLAMAV: Docker Tag 0.104.2 has 9 Medium Vulnerabilities
> for Busy Box
>
> > My team is new to maintaining images on Docker Hub. We hadn't yet
> > identified the best practices for how to publish an image for the same
> > ClamAV version with a new base image. After a little investigation, I
> > settled on this on this scheme.
> >
> I can see ;)
>
> This is of course crap.
>
> # Wait forever (or until canceled)
>         exec tail -f "/dev/null"
>
> The goal of the entrypoint.sh exec is that if it terminates the OC can
> take proper action, eg restart the task. In your case clamd can crash and
> no action will be taken, because the OC monitors a useless tail?????
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> clamav-users mailing list
> clamav-users at lists.clamav.net
> https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
>
>
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
>
> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clamav.net/pipermail/clamav-users/attachments/20220218/928c16d5/attachment.htm>