Just as a reminder, so no one is getting frustrated by the CentOS (or other distro) package maintainers:

We (ClamAV team) made a mistake in the ClamAV 0.101.0 header files impacting projects downstream that rely on our library.  I just re-posted the details from our previous disclosure in a new blog entry, to reach a wider audience since a lot of folks probably didn't see the mailing list annoucement: https://blog.clamav.net/2018/12/libclamav-missing-headers-issue.html 

Because of the header file issue, package maintainers have been holding off until we get a patch release out.

Sorry for the inconvenience!

Micah

 
Micah Snyder
ClamAV Development
Talos
Cisco Systems, Inc.

On Dec 21, 2018, at 9:12 AM, Benny Pedersen <me@junc.eu> wrote:

Claudiu Albu skrev den 2018-12-21 13:56:

CLAMAV VERSION is:
"_WARNING: Local version: 0.100.2 Recommended version: 0.101.0_"
After some reading, this seems to be the latest version in a stable
CentOS EPEL stable repo - correct?

no

freshclam reports latest stable version, its upto centos maintainrs to put that version into there repo, 2 options now is, wait, build rpms localy self, and install that rpm update

http://lifeofageekadmin.com/build-rpms-centos/

why wait ? :=)
_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml