I think that Shadowservers statistics are drastically wrong and haven’t changed in about 5 years. That’s number one. 

Sent from my  iPhone

On Feb 15, 2019, at 04:26, 조정환 <jo9237@korea.kr> wrote:

Hello everyone ~

 

I looked around the other site bulletin board for .clamav, and I had a question, so I got a question here.

 

If you are using clamav as a user and you are viewing an internet evaluation article,

 

'clamAV has a lot of error detection.' , 'The detection rate is lower than other products', and

 

'malicious code detection rate' based on 'https://www.shadowserver.org/' It is not good because it is only 23.46% (as of 2018).

I am wondering what you think about clamAV's malware error detection rate and accurate detection rate.

Another is, if so, what are the criteria or rationale?

And finally, if the error detection rate is high and the detection rate is low, I wonder what method to use to increase this.




_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml